It seems that many groups that were once supportive of the program are now expressing deep reservations. Indeed, the discontent appears to be deeper than what might be expected as agreeable platitudes evolve into hard and fast rules. Modern Medicine quotes one organization calling the new regulations a “deal killer.” At least 7 members of the US Senate have asked CMS to withdraw the proposed regs. But the complaints don’t end there.
The Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative found that “that the technology needed to support the ACO model either doesn’t exist or is so misaligned with the meaningful use of electronic medical record (EMR) technology that health care providers are going to have a tough time participating in both.”
Cleveland Clinic CEO Toby Cosgrove wrote an open letter to CMS Administrator Don Berwick saying the regs are,
“replete with prescriptive requirements that have little to do with outcomes…
“Further, we have concluded that the shared savings component (Shared Savings) is structured in such a way that creates real uncertainty about whether applicants will be able to achieve success.”
The American Medical Group Association reports that as the regulations currently stand, 93% of their members say they won’t enroll. The AMGA includes well-regarded institutions such as Geisinger Health System and Dartmouth-Hitchcock.
Our Take: While ACOs hold the promise of a significant break-through for patient engagement, they will obviously only work if the country’s healthcare organizations actually participate. It’s one thing to have political opponents criticizing the plan. It’s quite another to have long-term supporters, well-regarded and forward-thinking organizations like Cleveland Clinic and Geisinger Health System suddenly voicing dissent in such a public fashion. We have confidence that progress and compromise are possible on this issue. At least for now.
More information from: Modern Medicine, Becker’s Hospital Review, Search Health IT, and FierceHealthcare



