Featured Guest Co-Bloggers: Geri Lynn Baumblatt, M.A. and Nananda Col, M.D., M.P.H.
Excerpt from “The Value and Challenges of Shared Decision Making”, Dorland Review, February 2013
On the surface, Shared Decision Making (SDM) seems simple and straightforward. A clinician involves the patient in making a decision about their health. The clinician conveys the necessary medical information to the patient, explains their treatment options, and helps the patient understand how their values, goals and preferences can guide them to find the best treatment. And together they come to a preferred treatment plan. Though widely endorsed, SDM is uncommon in clinical practice.1
SDM is a process that goes beyond “informed decision making,” which is sometimes erroneously used interchangeably with SDM. But shared decision making is not simply about whether the patient has been informed and received enough information about their condition and its treatment, but a process where the provider helps the patient understand the decision, its consequences, and then helps them apply their values and preferences in order to make a decision.2




